What Happened Jonathan was convicted in a case that relied heavily on documentary evidence rather than decisive physical proof. Over time, serious questions have emerged regarding the authenticity and reliability of key documents used during prosecution. Independent post-conviction review efforts are now underway to examine these concerns through lawful and professional means. Key Concerns Lack of conclusive physical evidence Disputed documents critical to the conviction Procedural issues that limited full examination at trial Timeline Overview Arrest and prosecution Conviction and sentencing Years of incarceration and rehabilitation Emergence of disputed-document concerns Current post-conviction and parole-related advocacy This campaign seeks review—not assumptions—and accountability through due process. Here it the link to read in details about his case :